Systems to prevent poaching near watercourses

Alternative watering systems, including solar-powered water troughs, have been trialled by SAC Consulting, part of Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), as a way of complying with Scottish Government Legislation.

Autumn and early winter are important times for managing diffuse pollution and watercourses. As rainfall increases and green cover diminishes, the risk of leaching, poaching and erosion rises.

Through the Farming and Water Scotland initiative, SAC Consulting has been working with SEPA and farmers to develop four cost-effective, practical solutions to the most commonly breached diffuse pollution regulation – General Binding Rule 19.

SAC Consulting’s Environment Team Leader, Rebecca Audsley, said:

“Often GBR 19 breaches arise from stock visiting watercourses to drink,” explained Rebecca. “As the regulations don’t require watercourses to be fenced off, we’ve been investigating and promoting solutions that take water from natural resources and pump it into well-sited water troughs, drawing livestock away from areas vulnerable to poaching and erosion, such as riverbanks.”

In 2016 SAC Consulting started trialling a pasture pump, two solar pumps and a ram pump at farms across the country.

“Many farmers will already be familiar with the traditional cast-iron pasture pump,” noted Rebecca. “When livestock drink from the bowl, their noses force a lever which operates a vacuum pump that delivers the drinking water. One pasture pump will supply around 12-15 head of beef cattle. For larger herds, we’ve been experimenting with clusters of three pumps fixed to a concrete plinth.”

The second mechanical solution the team has trialled is a ‘Papa Pump’ which draws water from the burn, or stream, into a tank by harnessing the energy from the stream’s flow.  “Once installed, there are no operating costs, so it’s free water, 24 hours a day, seven days a week,” said Rebecca.

When SAC Consulting first started the research, off-the-shelf solar powered watering troughs didn’t exist, and the team had to seek different solutions.

“We contacted a company that was working on a prototype and they created a model for us to trial,” she said. “The system uses a solar panel to charge a battery. The battery powers a pump taking water from the burn and a float switch in the trough regulates water levels. The advantage of this design is that the battery can also be used to power an electric fence.”

She adds that the second solar-powered system they tested was originally designed by a company more used to extracting water from wells in developing countries.  The solution supplies a larger trough and is powered by two larger solar panels.  It has no battery and the pump is powered by the solar panels alone.  The trough holds enough water for stock for three days, so, if the weather turns and sunlight levels fall, stock will still have access to drinking water. The system also has a second gravity-fed tank.

Robert Ramsay, SAC Consulting Beef Specialist, also farms. He has 40 suckler cows and 300 breeding ewes. Pressure on the farm’s private water supply encouraged him to install two solar-powered troughs. His full story can be heard on the Farming and Water Scotland podcast.

“On the private water supply, we couldn’t get water to two thirds of the fields on the farm, so we relied on rivers and ditches for them to drink, which inevitably led to some poaching,” he said.

He added that mains water wasn’t an option and that they were conscious of the need to fence off the river access to prevent poaching and bank erosion.

“We looked at all the options and accessed AECS funding for two solar-powered pumps,” he said. “It’s a pressurised system, just like a mains supply.”

Newlands farm encompasses Loudounhill, meaning that, over the 300 acres of grazing land, elevation rises from 500-1,100ft elevations. The water is sourced from two purpose built abstraction points in the River Irvine, and a network of pipes was installed to feed the troughs.

“It’s been a revelation and has addressed other issues like lameness in cattle when accessing stony areas close to rivers.”

Rebecca Audsley added: “One of the most surprising results of the farm trials was that, if well sited, livestock preferred drinking from troughs rather than getting in and out of the burn.

“Which system is best suited to a given farm – or field – very much depends on the livestock, the topography and personal preference,” she said. “Like with any farm equipment choices, it’s horses for courses.

“What’s important is that they all help farmers comply with regulations. By encouraging stock away from watercourses, they reduce the risk of poaching, erosion and diffuse pollution. There are benefits to the farm business too, because they ensure valuable nutrients in topsoil and from muck are retained on the land where they can be productive.”

 

Get Our E-Newsletter - breaking news to your in-box twice a week
Will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy
Share.

About The Author

John Swire - Deputy editor of Agronomist and Arable Farmer as well as responsibility for the Agronomist and Arable Farmer and Farm Business websites. After 17 years milking cows on the family farm John started writing about agriculture in 1998 and has since written for a variety of publications and has developed a wide circle of contacts within the industry. When not working John is a season ticket holder at Stoke City and also of late has become a fitness freak, listing cycling, swimming and walking as his exercises of choice.